• UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      More economically to shut down and reincorporate than to spend a bunch of money on lawyers.

      But I doubt Musk is going to see a flood of new ad revenue out of this.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        5 months ago

        new ad revenue

        I’m no marketing guy, and all other things aside, signing an advertising agreement with X would be a hard “NO” after this suit.

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      5 months ago

      Maybe it’s a Win win. Less advertisers and Elon looks like a psychopath and disuades further ad income for his hate platform

  • Zak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    105
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Musk: starts allowing Nazi shit on Xitter

    Advertiisers: Hey, we don’t like Nazi shit. We might stop advertising if that keeps happening.

    Musk: Go fuck yourself. Is that clear? I hope it is.

    Advertisers: stop doing business with the guy who told them to go fuck themselves

  • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Today, the House Judiciary GOP’s official account on X called GARM being discontinued a “big win for the First Amendment” and a “big win for oversight.” X CEO Linda Yaccarino also applauded the news.

    It’s just opposite day? We just say whatever is the opposite of what’s true?

  • themurphy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    5 months ago

    He literally bullied a non-profit organisation set in the world to use advertisement money responsible into ceasing operations.

    Loss for the world once again, and the article even says that Republicans celebrated. That country is sick.

  • norimee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    THIS IS NOT A GOOD THING.
    He didn’t shut down advertisers, he shut down an organisation for best practices in advertising.

    Wiki World Federation of Advertisers

    WFA’s aim is to champion effective and sustainable marketing communications worldwide. …

    …WFA formed the Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM), a global cross-industry alliance which aims to improve digital safety and eliminate harmful online content…The alliance has introduced guidelines concerning misinformation and new standards on ad placements…

    …WFA is a founding member of the Unstereotype Alliance, UN Women’s flagship partnership with the marketing industry to eradicate harmful gender stereotypes in advertising…It is also a founding member of the Coalition for Better Ads, a cross-industry initiative to improve consumers’ experience with online advertising.

    WFA holds Global Marketer Week, a series of events bringing together brand marketers to learn about the latest public affairs issues and best practice in marketing.

  • schema@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    5 months ago

    Even if this group shuts down completely, all this does is waste twitter’s money while it also tells advertisers to stay the fuck away from ever do any business on Twitter.

    • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      5 months ago

      And now he has to sue the advertisers individually if he wants to continue this idiotic plan. That’ll surely convince people to spend money on X

    • Vanon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 months ago

      I read this similarly. Most significantly, advertisers in the group are probably less likely to spend on tweeter now. The complete opposite of Elen’s goal. The advertisers simply “deleted” the group (not any actual ad agencies), because it was calculated to cost the least. The group, GARM, was an attempt to collectively manage harm to their brands, which they will obviously continue to do in other ways.

  • Red_October@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Sounds to me like all advertisers should just assume that on Xitter, their ads will show alongside Nazi/Alt-Right/Hateful content. GARM, the project that Elmo just killed, used to inform them when that sort of thing happened. So with the warning system down, Ad companies should revert to a fail-safe state and abandon the platform completely.

    And the rest of us should ABSOLUTELY make a habit of blasting out screenshots of ads next to heinous shit, and ask the company why they support that kind of content.

    • Revan343@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      And the rest of us should ABSOLUTELY make a habit of blasting out screenshots of ads next to heinous shit, and ask the company why they support that kind of content.

      This is the way

    • axh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      And the rest of us should ABSOLUTELY make a habit of blasting out screenshots

      Good idea, but stopping using xitter completely would be even better.

  • DrunkenPirate@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Note to myself: Whenever I do contracts or somehow being responsible, I‘ll put a proxy company in between. If things go bad, I just shut down that responsible proxy and am out of duty.

    Just an interesting observation about business behavior.

  • EatMyPixelDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    5 months ago

    I feel like this will only hurt him in the long term, advertisers in general are probably more likely to avoid X in the future. I know I would.

    • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      5 months ago

      They are all the biggest snowflakes. The slightest criticism breaks their fragile egos. Billionaires really require a safe space.

    • Gsus4@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s cheap to them and bankrupts their victims or forces them to settle. There should be a way to punish frivolous lawsuits by %income/assets.

    • Thebular@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      5 months ago

      It definitely is, but they filed in Texas which doesn’t have anti-SLAPP laws for federal cases

  • YeetPics@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I wish Elon treated the whole planet like his children.

    He would just jet off and never communicate again, we would be free of this cancer for good.

  • Simulation6@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    5 months ago

    They are getting all this great free press about why to avoid Musk, must have figured their job is done.