Boots need shining, and Dessalines is positively salivating at the thought

    • PoTayToes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      Tell me though, which company will not hand over what data they have when asked by their country’s judiciary?

      The question here is how much data they keep. Strict legal minimum or more.

      • qaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        You obviously didn’t watch the video, the point made is not that there is information being handed over (every company has to comply with legal orders), but that Singal handed over nothing except 2 timestamps shared as integers.

        • PoTayToes@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 month ago

          You are correct though, I did indeed not watch it. Hence I misunderstood the comment I was answering to as being negative towards Signal. Thanks for the added context.

    • ivn@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      While this is true it’s still good to add nuance.

      There is a difference between judiciary and intelligence context in these kind of things, if you use a tool in a judiciary context you burn it (as with the FBI malware on Playpen). So it’s probably better to keep it low, even avoid to use some of the information gathered, so you keep the intelligence source.

      I’m not saying that’s what’s going on, just that this is not an absolute proof.