• halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      None of that should even matter.

      Disney is claiming the one line in the terms and conditions of a free trial of Disney+ years ago means the consumer must abide by those terms in perpetuity for anything Disney related. Even things completely unrelated to Disney+.

        • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          My point is the agreement was for an entirely unrelated product. A restaurant is in no way associated with the Disney+ streaming service. No one would expect the terms and conditions from a streaming service to apply to a sit down restaurant.

          I’d even say that while they’re both under the Disney brand, they almost certainly are separate companies, further differentiating their products.