• ealoe@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yes and no; technically they’re an independent entity but they’ve been used as useful idiots by Russian intelligence so many times at this point they’re effectively Russian

    • BumpingFuglies@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      3 months ago

      No, the whole “Wikileaks is a Russian asset” story is a farce used to unjustly discredit them, since they’ve published some extremely damning documents.

      • Bananigans@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        It might be because RT gave Assange his talk show on state run tv, RT claimed WikiLeaks as a partner, Assange dumped the 2016 emails after Trump’s “Russia if your listening” statement, or because after Assange claimed the hacker that provided WikiLeaks with those 2016 emails wasn’t Russian, he was.

        If you step back and squint, it kind of looks like he was working with Russia because of all the work with Russia.

      • TheFriar@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I mean, that’s not entirely true. Yeah, there has been a long history of US based organizations, particularly governmental ones, trying to stop Wikileaks, capture Snowden, and generally just punish whistleblowers so brutally is deters anyone else from doing it.

        But that doesn’t mean that as the years went on, the mission of Wikileaks changed as they seemed to adopt a particular goal that wasn’t just “shining a light on corruption.”

        So it’s not as simple as “it’s a Russian asset” and it’s not as simple as “they’re being smeared for spilling govt secrets.” It’s a mixture of the two, but not only, and not entirely.