Prove that you can do it on the moon first then we can talk about Mars.
Seriously. I donāt understand and never understood how this wasnāt the very obvious first step.
People might still die. Unfortunately thereās no way around that. But thereās a massive difference between āhelp is 7 days away with an emergency launchā and āhelp is never comingā. Iām not sure the exact time scales they could get emergency readiness for, but I can tell you itās a whole hell of a lot faster than it is for everything to align for a mars mission.
Also, if deaths do happen, you can learn a whole hell of a lot more about means of failure investigating the issue on the moon.
Yep, figure out Moon dust solutions and Mars becomes a bit easier. But absolutely the distance is key, and the Moon isnāt THAT easy to get to, but at least itās less than years away, one way.
Plus once you get it working, you can set up retirement communities up there. Gives old people a chance to take a pioneering risk so we can sort out the kinks and grow the space with purpose, and makes them feel a lot better being in reduced gravity.
Iāve even got a slogan! Itās cheesy and totally 1950s sci-fi, so perfect!
āRetire in comfort on the moon, where 1/6 gravity makes old bodies feel new again!ā
help is 7 days away with an emergency launch
Itās more like 3, and you can talk to people on the ground with just some lag, too (although you need a satellite rebroadcast when over the dark side).
Mars, on the other hand, is months away, may not be exitable at all at a given time with a given craft, and has latency similar to a carrier pigeon with an SD card strapped to it.
I just didnāt want to pretend it was an hour. Response time would definitely be dependent on your investment, the urgency of the situation, etc, but even on the longer end of the spectrum, there are a lot of failures you are able to recover from that you couldnāt on Mars. āThis critical component we will die without is degrading 1% per weekā gives you plenty of time to solve the problem on the moon and no chance in hell on Mars.
The only real estate upside to Mars is a tenuous wisp of atmosphere. Other than that, the Moon is superior in every way.
Iād consider a Moon colony, a floating Venus colony, a Titan colony or a space station. You couldnāt pay me enough to go anywhere else, since thereās nothing there to spend it on anyway.
Edit: Or interstellar stuff, I guess.
Liquid water under Marsā surface could be a huge upside if we can confirm itās there and figure out how to get to it
The moon has water too, and melting it is NBD, so theyāre actually equal there for real estate purposes.
For scientific purposes liquid water is interesting, but itās much easier to send a robot than all the various amenities needed for human scientists, and probably always will be.
Well duh. We havenāt even solved living on the ISS for more than a year at a time yet.
That is primarily an issue with the lack of gravityās effect on the human body. It is hard to get enough exercise to maintain strength in muscles, maintaining bone density, and other bodily functions so that the astronaut can have a regular life back on Earth.
Mars has enough gravity that bodily atrophy should not be a significant issue for people that return, and it shouldnāt be an issue at all for people who stay on Mars.
There are a ton of other massive hurdles on Mars, but they are not related to the cautionary limitation on individualās trips to the ISS.
Mars has enough gravity that bodily atrophy should not be a significant issue for people that return, and it shouldnāt be an issue at all for people who stay on Mars.
Thatās actually totally unknown. It could be, or it could be that you need almost a full G to stay healthy.
Iām disappointed that the ISS never got a rotating torus module. Maybe Lunar Gateway or one of the upcoming commercial stations will get one.
I was going to make a joke that The Vergeās definition of āeasyā seems to be different than mine, but the first sentence in the actual article is āSending people to Mars wonāt be easyā. I get the feeling the writer and the editor are not in speaking terms.
Surprised the article doesnāt mention the recently published A City on Mars ā a book by Kelly and Zach Weinersmith, of Bea Wolf and SMBC. It talks about lots of other stuff but covers this too.
