BrikoX@lemmy.zipM to Technology@lemmy.zip · 4 months agoNothing is requiring employees to be in the office five days a weekwww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square66fedilinkarrow-up1297arrow-down18file-textcross-posted to: antiwork@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1289arrow-down1external-linkNothing is requiring employees to be in the office five days a weekwww.theverge.comBrikoX@lemmy.zipM to Technology@lemmy.zip · 4 months agomessage-square66fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: antiwork@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.world
minus-squareP03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up54·4 months ago“Nothing is requiring employees to be in the office five days a week” Yes, you’re right. There isn’t a thing that requires this. You shouldn’t be required to do so. The problem with naming a company an idiotic name like “Nothing” is that it’s so easy to make who’s-on-first jokes.
minus-squarehuzzahunimpressively@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·edit-24 months ago theres nothing i hate more than nothing nothing keeps me up at night i toss and turn over nothing nothing can cause a great big fight Yeah I was really confused when I read the title lol, I have to remember that there is a company named Nothing
“Nothing is requiring employees to be in the office five days a week”
Yes, you’re right. There isn’t a thing that requires this. You shouldn’t be required to do so.
The problem with naming a company an idiotic name like “Nothing” is that it’s so easy to make who’s-on-first jokes.
Yeah I was really confused when I read the title lol, I have to remember that there is a company named Nothing