Lawmakers want to crack down on “junk fees,” but restaurants are trying to stay out of the fight.

Surcharges or fees covering everything from credit card processing to gratuities to “inflation” have become more popular on restaurant checks in recent years.

Last year, 15% of restaurant owners added surcharges or fees to checks because of higher costs, according to the National Restaurant Association. In the second quarter, 3.7% of restaurant transactions processed by Square included a service fee, more than double the beginning of 2022, according to a recent report from the company.

Opponents of the practice say those fees and surcharges may surprise customers, hoodwinking them into paying more for their meals at a time when their wallets are already feeling thin. Fed-up diners compiled spreadsheets via Reddit of restaurants in Los AngelesChicago and D.C. charging hidden fees. Even the Onion took a swing at the practice, publishing a satirical story in May with the headline “Restaurant Check Includes 3% Surcharge To Provide Owner’s Sugar Baby With Birkin.”

  • Melody Fwygon@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    I never advanced from a 10% tip…if I thought the service and establishment justified tipping at all. Otherwise 0% tip.

    Tipping is strictly optional; and anyone pressuring you otherwise is an asshat who doesn’t need your business.

    • gerbler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      Unless your server has to tip out (which they all do) and so by choosing to hit that 0% your server now has to pay to serve you.

      • Melody Fwygon@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Businesses that do this do not get my visits usually. It’s usually pretty evident.

        I’m not going to fund that; and they should be demanding that the system stop and be adjusted so that such cases do not in fact happen.

      • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Golly, I guess we’ll just keep subsidizing the fucking restaurant owner instead of doing anything.

        • gerbler@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          The owners do not give half a shit if you tip their workers or not. They get their tipout regardless.

          You can actually help by tackling tipping culture on a city/province/state level. You’re not doing anything by stiffing your server besides saving yourself money and costing your server. If you don’t go out to restaurants then whether your tip or not is no one’s concern.

          Otherwise you’re still rewarding tipping culture by patronising venues that pay their workers a sub-livable wage.

        • BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Your options are tip well, or don’t eat out. It absolutely sucks that owners are making customers subsidize their employees’ wages, but by receiving the service you are expected to pay for the service. Tipping culture does suck. But it helps no one to tip poorly.

          • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            It helps me and erodes tipping culture as a whole. I’m curious how you think we’ll ever get past tipping culture without one of the first steps being “stop tipping for everything”.

            And I absolutely do pay for the service. I pay the listed price of what I’m purchasing. That should be all that’s “expected”. You have been brainwashed into thinking that somehow shouldn’t include the cost of service. Absolutely insane.