tapdattl@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 年前Should I?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square96fedilinkarrow-up11.23Karrow-down120file-text
arrow-up11.21Karrow-down1imageShould I?lemmy.worldtapdattl@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 年前message-square96fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareJerb322@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up30·1 年前Probably clear the STOP sign. If you’re flying over it, you don’t have to stop,right?
minus-squarepartial_accumen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up19·1 年前Cops hate this one trick! The STOP sign clearly is out of its jurisdiction above the sign itself.
minus-squaretapdattl@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·1 年前Yeah I don’t think the stop sign applies to airborne vehicles
minus-squareTheSaneWriter@lemmy.thesanewriter.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 年前Technically true. I doubt planes stop for that stop sign after all.
Probably clear the STOP sign. If you’re flying over it, you don’t have to stop,right?
Cops hate this one trick! The STOP sign clearly is out of its jurisdiction above the sign itself.
Yeah I don’t think the stop sign applies to airborne vehicles
Yeah but light pole and tree sure do
Pfftt, barely a inconvenience.
Technically true. I doubt planes stop for that stop sign after all.