• SacredExcrement [any, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Democratic consultants for swing seat candidates are increasingly anxious that a well-organized campaign by conservatives to sink a proposed state constitutional amendment on abortion could hurt the party’s candidates in battleground seats.

    For now, top New York Democrats are not planning to open up their coffers to respond to those attacks.

    The unwillingness to spend has some party operatives concerned state Democratic leaders are failing to effectively counter an opposition that has seized on the amendment’s expansive language pledging rights for LGBTQ+ people. The so-called equality amendment would ban discrimination against “gender identity” and “pregnancy outcomes,” adding to current constitutional protections for race and religion.

    Perfectly content with being losers, same as always

    …An opposition group, Coalition to Protect Kids-NY, has organized rallies and news conferences in recent weeks to highlight its concerns. The events have not focused on abortion but have aired claims the amendment’s language would enable mixed-gender sports…

    Republican candidates for the House and state Legislature warn the amendment would lead to trans people playing in women’s sports or weaken statutory rape laws — claims supporters of the amendment have said are false and amount to fearmongering.

    monke-rage

    One Democratic consultant who has reviewed internal polling found voters in battleground House districts are susceptible to the argument that the amendment would harm kids. Voters generally support abortion rights and the rights of LGBTQ+ people, the polling found.

    “But if you add in the far-right talking points about this — boys competing in girls’ sports — support erodes quickly, and in these swing districts it can dampen the enthusiasm for the candidates who are running on a support position,” said one Democrat who reviewed the data and was granted anonymity to speak frankly about the internal polling.

    It should be considered self defense to REDACTED conservative politicians and pundits.

    • Wheaties [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 months ago

      Completely incapable of contradicting a narrative. It would be so easy to run a “Conservatives actually hate it when you have freedom” response to this, to laugh at the absurd claims and flat out deny them. But they won’t

  • GrouchyGrouse [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Typical Dem logic of “if we do the good thing we might lose seats. So we’re not going to do the good thing so we can keep our seats because losing seats would prevent us from doing the good thing.”

    Astounding shit.