LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net to science@lemmy.world · 2 months agoThe Theory That Men Evolved to Hunt and Women Evolved to Gather Is Wrongwww.scientificamerican.comexternal-linkmessage-square146fedilinkarrow-up1361arrow-down147file-textcross-posted to: anarcho_primitivism@lemmy.worldscience@beehaw.orgarchaeology@mander.xyznews@lemmy.world
arrow-up1314arrow-down1external-linkThe Theory That Men Evolved to Hunt and Women Evolved to Gather Is Wrongwww.scientificamerican.comLibertyLizard@slrpnk.net to science@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square146fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: anarcho_primitivism@lemmy.worldscience@beehaw.orgarchaeology@mander.xyznews@lemmy.world
minus-squareCypher@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down4·2 months agoI am concerned only with the factuality of the data presented and have zero interest in cultural implications and any inferences that may be drawn from them.
minus-squarekofe@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down5·2 months agoYou do you. Data alone is pretty useless to me.
minus-squareCypher@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down4·2 months agoConclusions drawn from incomplete or misleading data are worthless to everyone
minus-squarekofe@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·2 months agoIf you think my argument is missing something, by all means, it would be useful to say that rather than passive aggressive.
I am concerned only with the factuality of the data presented and have zero interest in cultural implications and any inferences that may be drawn from them.
You do you. Data alone is pretty useless to me.
Conclusions drawn from incomplete or misleading data are worthless to everyone
If you think my argument is missing something, by all means, it would be useful to say that rather than passive aggressive.