• Murvel@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    2 months ago

    I just looked at the measured data and came to a conclusion. I don’t even know what conclusion you’re trying to communicate, but it beats me…

      • Murvel@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        I was asking the commenter to explain what a ‘better’ runner is supposed to mean? And tou perhaps was answering something else…

        • dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          Better doesn’t always equal faster.

          Better can equal going further.

          Better can equal being more efficient.

          Efficient means using less calories to do the same thing.

          • Murvel@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Sure. But you then need to show the data that supports those points

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Can you please show us what connects your data to being a success as an endurance hunter? Because “men hold more records running a specific distance faster than women do” is not in any way an indication of hunting success.

              Do you think Olympic target shooters make the best hunters when it comes to guns and bows?

              • Murvel@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                I never said anything about exactly what makes a good hunter. I was making a counterpoint to the quote of the article