• nul9o9@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    There are small modifications that can be done to convert guns to full auto. Glock switches and auto seers, or what not. The idea of usi g this to spy on printers is frustrating.

    • Addv4@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yep. Plus, what measures would be required to defeat basic printer blocks? Could it defect differences in tolerance? What if you redesigned an internal part to make the overall print slightly different? It an endless task that doesn’t seem like it will be very useful for anything other than random surveillance.

      • Ellia Plissken@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        probably some sort of comparison list of shapes that it can’t produce. like how photocopy and printer manufacturers make it so you can’t copy legal tender

        • Addv4@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yeah, but when you are doing that you are basically just comparing to what it can’t be. This would be looking at any possible way to design a mechanism to (for instance) turn a semi auto to a full auto, which is to say having something that can independently look at stuff, automatically redesign them in all of the unexpected ways, and ban those from ever being printed.

          • Ellia Plissken@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I think at best they’re going to be playing a catch up game at all times. it might be nice and easy for printers that are connected to the internet and can get regular updates, but it doesn’t take a genius to airgap his printer