BrikoX@lemmy.zipM to Technology@lemmy.zipEnglish · 2 months agoProposed underwater data center surprises regulators who hadn’t heard about itarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up142arrow-down10file-textcross-posted to: politics@sh.itjust.works
arrow-up142arrow-down1external-linkProposed underwater data center surprises regulators who hadn’t heard about itarstechnica.comBrikoX@lemmy.zipM to Technology@lemmy.zipEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square9fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: politics@sh.itjust.works
minus-squareBrikoX@lemmy.zipOPMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up29·2 months agoYes. More specifically, the heat dumped by the servers would allow toxic algae to spread.
minus-squareCosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·edit-22 months agoBut what about shareholder value? Surely the spreading of toxic algae would be dwarfed in comparison. And because the algae affects everyone, the city should pay for any clean up. We can’t be taxed because we didn’t make any profit. The stock buy backs cost more than we anticipated so we actually took a huge loss… MONEY PWEEASE!
minus-squareandrewth09@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 months agoToxic algae is an externality that companies have no moral obligation to be concerned about. Ezpz.
Yes. More specifically, the heat dumped by the servers would allow toxic algae to spread.
But what about shareholder value? Surely the spreading of toxic algae would be dwarfed in comparison.
And because the algae affects everyone, the city should pay for any clean up.
We can’t be taxed because we didn’t make any profit. The stock buy backs cost more than we anticipated so we actually took a huge loss…
MONEY PWEEASE!
Toxic algae is an externality that companies have no moral obligation to be concerned about. Ezpz.