• Funkytom467@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    For distance and mass, zero means no distance and no mass.

    For temperature though having none means no kinetic energy of atoms/molecules. It’s absolute zero, the zero Kelvin. So the other units are the weird ones.

    But since zero Kelvin isn’t a phenomenon you’ll ever encounter in nature, it makes Kelvin a pretty unappealing scale for everyday life.

    And thus we started making shit up…

    P.S. My bad Rankine also shakes hands with Kelvin about absolute zero, very demure, very mindful.

    • Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 days ago

      When most of the temperature scales were made, they didn’t even know yet that there was a zero, I mean, theoretically, they likely knew or assumed. But they had no way of practically measuring it yet, at the very least.

      I do think that as much as it would be weird for a couple of years, it would help a lot in the long run to widely adopt a temperature scale that starts at 0.

      Because honestly, the percentage of adults I come across that have no idea how temperature works or what it even is conceptually beyond just “a nice day or a bad day” or “this is the number for cooking this thing” is astonishing.

      • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        I knew a girl years ago who thought that the temperatures on her oven must use a different scale than the temperature on her thermometer and whatnot. Because surely nothing could get to 500 degrees fahrenheit and not, like, melt the stove. It’s gotta be a different scale.