• ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Your argument that other people are engaging in black and white thinking when you take the position that the possibility of injustice makes justice unobtainable is funny.

      • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Sure: you disregard this specific case and only bring up other hypothetical cases to prove why this is unjust. Like you just did in the comment I replied to.

          • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yeah, it’s a black and white position. You specifically are saying the state is unable to obtain justice because of the “risk”. You preclude the possibility of justice being obtained. I’m pretty amazed you can find so many ways to say the same thing and not realize that. But hey, I’m sure it’s just everybody else being irrational right?

              • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 months ago

                This is how people figure out how each other think, calm down.

                It does seem you are saying governments shouldnt be permitted to seek justice against misinformation because doing so puts a greater injustice on the public as a whole.

                Thats me rephrasing your point from earlier to see if I understand it right, so if I have it wrong feel free to explain.

              • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                So… After being asked by multiple people to clarify your position, you’re not going to after all?