cm0002@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 day agoIt's coming! :(lemmy.worldimagemessage-square122fedilinkarrow-up1852arrow-down173
arrow-up1779arrow-down1imageIt's coming! :(lemmy.worldcm0002@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 day agomessage-square122fedilink
minus-squarecqst@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up28arrow-down2·19 hours agoThere will be no improvement with browsers until the introduction of one with a strong copyleft license.
minus-squareLarmyOfLone@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up12·edit-216 hours agoI’m curious, how is copyleft license supposed to improve the quality of browser development?
minus-squareareyouevenreal@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up9·17 hours agoDon’t Firefox and Chromium already have that?
minus-squareunemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·4 hours agoChromium is fully entrenched. “strong copyleft”? Even Microsoft bent to the will of Chromium. And Firefox is just a silly thing where people like me hang on
minus-squareareyouevenreal@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 hours agoIf I remember correctly it’s under a copy left license which makes sense given it’s ultimately a derivative of KHTML.
There will be no improvement with browsers until the introduction of one with a strong copyleft license.
I’m curious, how is copyleft license supposed to improve the quality of browser development?
Don’t Firefox and Chromium already have that?
Chromium is fully entrenched. “strong copyleft”? Even Microsoft bent to the will of Chromium. And Firefox is just a silly thing where people like me hang on
If I remember correctly it’s under a copy left license which makes sense given it’s ultimately a derivative of KHTML.
doesn’t gpl exist? its quite strong.