• swim@slrpnk.net
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    But the contention is about music being better, and that’s some bad music.

    • Graphy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Did we read the same post?

      Music was better when ugly people were allowed to make it

      I guess your comment makes sense if you find those two attractive.

      Like I get the boomer joke of music these days sucks but my comment was leaning into joke.

      • swim@slrpnk.net
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Your comment makes sense in the frame of “ugly people are allowed to make music,” my comment refers to the “music was better” part of the post.

        The ugly people you mentioned don’t support your comment’s argument against the original assertion because their music is terrible, not “better.”

        Some music sucked in the boomer’s days, made by ugly and pretty people alike.