• Crampon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s not a protected title. Go to town with it.

    But it’s diluting the value of it if you carry no talent but want all the recognition.

        • YungOnions@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          3 months ago

          What’re you defining ‘value’? Monetary, sure but what of emotional value? What’re you defining as ‘quality’? What’s high quality art to you? What’s valuable in your view? I garuntee that’s not the same for everyone.

          • Amoeba_Girl@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            3 months ago

            Very true, since it’s all relative no one should ever make an aesthetic judgement. No one should have thoughts about the value of art. No one should have any reaction to art other than an acknowledgement of its existence.

          • V0ldek@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 months ago

            True J. Benzo Peterson vibes

            What do you mean by VALUE? What do you mean by QUALITY? What do you mean by PRODUCTS?? What do you mean by WHAT???

        • YungOnions@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          No, the value of art is specific to each individual. A picture made by someone with no talent can be of enormous value to someone because of what it means, the relationship they have with the creator, the emotions it makes them feel etc.

          Tieing value to talent suggests that a picture by someone who has trained for 5 years is somehow more ‘valuable’ than a picture by someone who has only trained for 4. Why? What metric is being used to determine ‘value’? What metric determines ‘talent’? Art is entirely subjective. To try and define it’s value is missing the point, because it means something different to everyone.

      • Jonathan Hendry@iosdev.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        @YungOnions

        What do you mean value?

        Emotional value? No. Many parents value their small child’s drawings.

        Market value? Mostly yes. Especially in commercial art like art commissioned for book covers. Untalented artists aren’t going to be very successful.