David Gerard@awful.systemsM to TechTakes@awful.systemsEnglish · 3 months agoPeople are ‘blatantly stealing my work,’ AI artist complains - with notes on a similar appeal that failed hard just recentlypivot-to-ai.comexternal-linkmessage-square46fedilinkarrow-up1127arrow-down10
arrow-up1127arrow-down1external-linkPeople are ‘blatantly stealing my work,’ AI artist complains - with notes on a similar appeal that failed hard just recentlypivot-to-ai.comDavid Gerard@awful.systemsM to TechTakes@awful.systemsEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square46fedilink
minus-squareTranscendentalEmpire@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·3 months ago so if he trained the model himself, would that make the work copyrightable? I think if he “trained” the model on art he himself created you might have an argument.
minus-squareanton@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·3 months agoNot in the US, there art can only be created by a human. If it’s created by an algorithm or animal supernatural being it’s public domain. Interesting facts: when photography was invented there was a debate whether photos can be copyrighted if you claim to have written down something revealed to you by a supernatural entity, it’s public domain the following image is public domain because it was taken by a monkey
I think if he “trained” the model on art he himself created you might have an argument.
Not in the US, there art can only be created by a human.
If it’s created by an algorithm or animal supernatural being it’s public domain.
Interesting facts: