• Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          3 months ago

          There’s a massive overlap between being anti-Marx and being liberal. Doesn’t mean all anti-Marxists are liberals, but most are.

        • DragonTypeWyvern
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          3 months ago

          It’s statistically likely, as is their inability to find the block button.

          • Fiona@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            No it’s more likely that they are an actual leftist. China and Ruzzia are (and the SU was!) fascist hellholes that have nothing to do with socialism and/or communism besides screaming it of the windows all the time.

            And people who delude themselves to believe something else are really annoying…

            • WillStealYourUsername@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              I agree in spirit! However the soviet union was neither capitalist nor communist, and fascism is a form of capitalism which means the soviet union wasn’t fascist, but rather something else entirely.

              • Fiona@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                I’m willing to agree partially: AFAIK the usual classification of the economic system of the SU is “state capitalism” which is indeed distinct from capitalism and socialism and I’m even willing to grant it that, if well executed (in the SU it mostly wasn’t) it has the potential to be better than capitalism in a few aspects.

                That said, I agree about the notion that fascism is a form of capitalism: The two are often associated with each other, but at the end of the day quite distinct and orthogoanl systems. Fascism is about having a powerful leader who oppresses the population and the SU very much had that in an almost textbook-manner with Stalin, though I will also acknowledge that there were of course detals in hwo it differed from say Naziism in Germany at the same time.

                • WillStealYourUsername@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Fascism is by definition a form of capitalism :P As defined by Mussolini back then and by political scientists today. It’s not just about dictatorship, but about the relationship between private businesses and the state.

          • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Fun fact: blocking a community doesn’t stop you from mentioning them in a joking manner elsewhere!