• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    They support a genocide of the poor. One that involves letting them starve to death due to the total lack of social services.

    • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Thats to be expected in American politics, I was referring to the fact that at least that dont support the military or funding Israel. Also genocide of the poor is entirely the fault of capitalism and you cant vote that away.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        “As long as they don’t support the genocide I care about, the genocide they would allow to happen because capitalism is fine.” Gotcha. You do realize that their idea of capitalism where that happens is only what they want, hence my point.

        Very few other people are saying there should be absolutely zero social services and near zero taxation. Just them. That is just death to the poor.

        • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          I never said I support capitalism, I said that I despise imperalism and militarism. Also have we not seen death to the poor under Liberalism, those social services are a band aid solution to the gaping wound that is capitalism. Ideally I would like to see a Libertarian-Socialist party get elected (or even better an Anarcho-Syndicalist revolution) but sadly those aren’t options yet.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            I wasn’t talking about you, I was talking about the members of the Libertarian party. Because that’s what they stand for. Elimination of almost all social services and taxes. Which would literally kill countless poor people. It would absolutely be genocidal. It’s just not the genocide that concerns you apparently.

            • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              7,877 homeless people died in the US during 2020 source

              Meanwhile over 34,904 Palestinians have been killed since Oct 7, over 1.1 million Palestinians are facing IPC Phase 5 catastrophic food insecurity, and over 1.7 million people have been displaced source

              How many millions of people have died and how many tens of millions of people have been killed by imperalism and war just over the course of the last two decades alone? Do you have no problem with it because those people are far away or do you have no problem because its the global south?

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Was the Libertarian Party in charge in 2020? No.

                Are homeless people the only sort of poor people who need assistance? No.

                So what the hell does this have to do with the Libertarian genocide of the poor that would happen if they were in power?

                • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Im saying does homeless genocide suck, absolutely. But even you have to acknowledge that the wars and genocides brought on by imperalism are significantly worse. The only difference is one is further away and in places you dont think about. At the end of the day I would rather we have neither but that won’t be achieved until capitalism is destroyed.

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    3 months ago

                    Yes, again, I get that you think one genocide is more important than another.

                    To me, genocide is genocide.

                    And, again, we’re talking about a hypothetical scenario.