• Zahille7@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          26 days ago

          I mean just the first episode of Invincible shows him absolutely destroying an old woman because he doesn’t have a handle on his powers yet. And then later he finds out she didn’t make it and he almost quit being a superhero because of it.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      But even in The Boys it’s just the bad guys doing that.

      The dark reality is that the good guys need to watch themselves too.

      • Binette@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        28 days ago
        Spoiler for the latest season and the spinoff

        They don’t mostly because they know the risk.

        In Gen V, the main character gets her powers by accidentally killing her parents.

        And in the latest season, Huey’s dad kills a bunch of patients because of his confusion due to dementia.

      • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        27 days ago
        spoiler

        Bro, the show opens with A-Train running through Huey’s girlfriend and turning her into flesh casserole. It’s the exposition to the main plot of the movie. They talk about how it happens all the time and they have a whole procedure for damage control. They introduce a support group for people hurt by supes, including a guy whose girlfriend accidentally froze his dick off during sex.

        I suppose there’s an argument that supes aren’t really “good guys”, but that traditional good vs. bad dichotomy isn’t really the point of the show.

        • rockerface 🇺🇦@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          27 days ago

          The “good” Supes also occasionally have to deal with collateral damage they cause

          spoiler

          Like Starlight accidentally blinding a bystander when stopping a robbery, which then comes back to haunt her

          • Zahille7@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            26 days ago

            That was such a bullshit copout. Like, yeah she blinded someone, which is horrible in its own right, but in the story if Starlight hadn’t acted then the woman would have been dead instead of blind. I’d take that trade any day.

      • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        27 days ago

        Super Crooks has this, iirc there’s even a comment at one point about the heroes having a bigger body count than the villains.

  • ch00f@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    28 days ago

    It always bugged me how in Man of Steel, Superman has to deal with the moral quandary of breaking the bad guy’s neck at the cost of vaporizing a family.

    Like they spent the previous 20 minutes punching each other through buildings. No way that was the first family they killed.

    • toynbee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      27 days ago

      I’ve missed a lot of DC movies, but wasn’t Ben Affleck’s Batman inspired to come out of retirement due to this … Or something like that? I might be completely bungling the details.

      • Donebrach@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        27 days ago

        Yeah, more or less. Then they stop fighting because both of their moms are named Martha. That movie is one of the worst things ever created.

      • icerunner_origin@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        29 days ago

        Critically panned, across the board, but I enjoyed it nonetheless. It could have done with another couple of rounds of script polishing.

      • Annoyed_🦀 @monyet.cc
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        29 days ago

        It’s okay, not memorable though. I can’t seems to recall anything from that movie but i do remember i have fun watching it.

        • Mister_Feeny@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          29 days ago

          I remember liking half of it. Oddly enough, I can’t remember whether I liked the first half where he’s a drunken bum, or the second half, where he’s more together, but I specifically remember thinking half of it was decent at least.

          So yeah, I agree that it’s not very memorable.

          • BigPotato@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            28 days ago

            You liked the drunken bum half. It just gets more stupid when the other guy’s woman is a super hero too.

      • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        28 days ago

        Have it on in the background.

        I never fully understood Katherine Heigl’s character and her point in the plot.

        It’s decent. Not great.

      • WindyRebel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        edit-2
        28 days ago

        It’s good, but upon re-watching it now from when I first watched it, and thinking a little differently about it - Superman talks about needing to be careful to not hurt people and cause deaths. Then he proceeds to put Darkseid through several buildings that obviously weren’t evacuated, followed by punching him so hard he goes through a couple layers of earth and totally destroys a bunch of infrastructure. He essentially shows his power and ignores everything he just said.

        I still love seeing Superman let loose and fuck Darkseid’s shit up though. 😂

        • Coelacanth@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          28 days ago

          I hadn’t seen it before so my first thought was “uhhh… Superman?”

          I mean were those buildings even evacuated? He probably killed a fair few innocent bystanders there 😂

          • Phen@lemmy.eco.br
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            28 days ago

            Superman knows where there’s people and where there isn’t. Authors can argue there wasn’t anyone there.

            • SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              28 days ago

              I wonder what insurance would look like for those people, tho. Like if you live in a city where this sort of thing happens even once every few years, nobody is going to insure the area. Maybe they have some sort of government program like FEMA, but like… even that would probably be very limited.

              So he may not be killing people outright, but he is very likely still absolutely destroying their lives at roughly the scale of a tornado.

              • Dasus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                27 days ago

                Theres definitely a TikTok sketch in the idea “superhero insurance”

                Like one of those greensceeen one actor things. “Moving to Gotham City” or something

                Edit just want to point out I don’t use tiktok but I see skits on YT

        • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          28 days ago

          Just because he knows he shouldn’t lose control, that doesn’t mean that it won’t happen now and again.

          I know a bunch of things that I should do and still fuck up on a regular basis.

          • WindyRebel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            28 days ago

            Sure, but he literally just gave a speech about it and then proceeds to ignore in roughly less than 30 seconds. 😂

  • I eat words@group.lt
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    29 days ago

    They cut all such scenes and pasted into The Boys, in a Mark Twain style “Sprinkle these around as you see fit!”.

  • SSTF@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    29 days ago

    Perhaps they are going for a tone of heroic escapism, or fantastical drama over gory and downbeat “realism”.

    If you really just want to see heroes maiming people it’s been done. Invincible, The Boys (show and comic). Even back to the 90s there were comics like Stormwatch that centered on the premise of “realistic” consequences of super powers.

    • Carrolade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      28 days ago

      The web serial Worm by Wildbow, written like 10-15 years ago maybe, is also a pretty good superhero deconstruction.

  • haywire@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    28 days ago

    Didn’t The Incredibles have a backstory like that where supes are basically illegal after they caused too much collateral damage?

    • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      Mr. Incredible is sued for stopping a man’s suicide and injuring him instead.

      In a Disney film.

      This is explicitly stated, to the camera, within the first 5 minutes.

      Holy shit Disney, you hadn’t “Up’d” us yet, chill

      • fishpen0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        28 days ago

        The first Incredibles movie was released two years before Pixar was bought by Disney

        • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          28 days ago

          Pixar wasn’t owned by them, but they were contractually obligated to be making movies for and with Disney

          • Coelacanth@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            28 days ago

            This article is a great rundown of Pixar and Disney, but while the latter did publish Pixar’s movies through the nineties and early naughties they had very little creative influence over them - especially compared to what would come post acquisition. Even the four “transitional” films (that had already begun production in 2006) are clearly more Pixar than Disney.

            • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              28 days ago

              Ok? Already knew all that

              The point is that Disney is famously child/family friendly and that they had influence on the film, thats why a direct reference to suicide in the first 5m is especially surprising: Disney let it happen

              Pixar actually being the ones who made it is entirely irrelevant to my point and also incredibly basic film trivia

              • Coelacanth@feddit.nu
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                28 days ago

                In general I tend to differentiate between creator and publisher in all art. It would have been a more shocking inclusion had it been a movie made by Disney themselves - at least to me. I’m open to being wrong about how much Disney meddled in Pixar stories pre 2006 purchase though. I can’t say it’s a subject I’ve studied at length. I know there is a book about Pixar but I haven’t read it. Do you have any sources?

      • andros_rex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        28 days ago

        It’s also got some somewhat overt Objectivist messaging? Syndrome’s line: “when everyone is super, no one will be.” is fascinating.

        Like, you can make an argument that a major message of the film is that some people are born special and more capable than others, and should be alotted special privileges. Syndrome isn’t one of the golden few, and rather than accept that, he attempts to democratize super powers to some extent (although because he’s the bad guy, part of his plan is making money from this).

        I love the film, I just get some odd vibes from it at times.

  • Dnb@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    28 days ago

    Invincible covers this a lot.

    It’s a major plot point in avengers as well, tbf, and why they spit up.

    • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      28 days ago

      I loved the first season of invincible. The thought came after watching a gif of captain America splitting a log with he bare hands. Like there should be PPE for just being around a super hero. He split that log with enough force to send a splinter strait through someone skull.

      Like deku in my hero flicks air to create a pressure wave that can propel him into the sky. The insane amount of force at play should have more collateral damage.

  • Tedesche@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    28 days ago

    Someone did an analysis of what would happen if Superman actually punched you at full strength, and it turns out his fist would never connect with you, because you’d be vaporized by the wave of nuclear explosions erupting from his knuckles as they caused air molecules to fuse in nanoseconds.

  • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    28 days ago

    I think Zach Snyder tried for this in Batman v Superman but of course he did so with no appreciation of the themes or subtlety. And Martha.

  • Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    28 days ago

    Brightburn. I haven’t seen it (yet), but alternate universe where Superman becomes evil. Trailers showed him absolutely wrecking his classmates in anger and frustration.

    • Illuminostro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      The kid (alien) was sent by his race to conquer the planet, like the Viltrumites in Invincible. The ship activated his genetic programming when he came of age.

      In many alternate Superman-esque stories, and in one arc of canon Superman, the alien race doesn’t look like humans. The ship Kal-El was sent in altered his DNA to make him resemble whatever species found him. I’ve always liked that take better. It’s probably the same for Brightburn, but never shown.

    • Zahille7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      That movie is pretty fucked, but in a weird way that makes it good? Like it’s kinda weird seeing Elizabeth Banks and that one guy from The Office being the parents, but they do a good job.

      There’s one scene in particular that kinda fucked me up, but you haven’t seen it so I won’t tell you.

  • BossDj@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    28 days ago

    Misfits is not really what you’re asking for, but is a more light hearted a-typical superhero show about people who were sentenced to community service all accidentally gaining super powers. They mostly use their powers selfishly but not in evil ways. It’s pretty well done as far as character growth