And if something did maybe happen, it’s the CIA’s fault

  • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    1 month ago

    The implication of what they’re saying is that the Chinese government’s actions generally represent the will of the Chinese people so you can’t just separate them like you can with America.

    • lugal@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Do you agree with this implication or did you just explain it to me? Because I would never equate the actions of the government of a nation state with the people who happen to live there

            • erin (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 month ago

              I don’t know how much you can trust the narrative when the media is all state controlled and anti-party speech is at best minimized, at worst censored. Total state control of the narrative is not conducive to free and fair elections, not to mention a police state. Before you whatabout, I’m well aware that the US is a police state and is controlled by two parties of neo-libs. I’m no supporter of the US, but I’m also no supporter of any autocratic regime. Calling the PRC a fair democracy is at best willfully ignoring the extreme state control over information, at worst denying a tyrannic despot twisting socialism into an autocratic, capitalist dictatorship while silencing opposition.