From CTV News (Bell Media):

“It might seem pretty rare to find a house with an elevator, but chances are higher you might find one in Calgary these days.”

  • cupboard@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Pretty much, the first thing the interviewed couple mentions is that they’re building an elevator in order to keep living in their home as they grow older (and assumedly become impaired due to age).

    • kandoh@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      It must be nice to have so much money that they can indulge their sentimentality like that.

      Imagine having to move into a new house without stairs, they’d lose the will to live and die after a month

      • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 hours ago

        It might be a purely financial decision of “we want to keep living independently but we can’t afford to buy a different house than the one we locked in 40 years ago, so lets spend a few thousand putting in an elevator instead of spending hundreds of thousands changing houses” since some major cities have housing markets that are simply that extreme

        • kandoh@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          My googling tells me:

          The typical cost to install a home elevator in a two-story house ranges from $30,000 to $60,000 on average

          Minimum cost: Around $20,000

          Maximum cost: Up to $100,000 or more

          National average: Approximately $48,000

          • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Honestly I was thinking of how things are for my family in LA, where house prices are so bonkers that its legitimately cheaper to renovate (although part of that probably also stems from the local tax law limiting property tax increases for existing homeowners) but that’s really my only secondhand experience with a truly unaffordable housing market so I don’t know how transferrable that is

            • kandoh@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Much doubt in that statement. Define ‘sellable’, is taking the price from 900,000 to 1.1 million making a house sellable? I guess you don’t want to leave 270,000 dollars on the table but if they’re at the point where they can’t walk up stairs ik going to hazard a guess that those amounts will result in the same quality of life for them

              • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                59 minutes ago

                Sellable as in the cost/price increase negate each other but you’re actually going to find a buyer within a reasonable timeframe

                  • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    30 minutes ago

                    Some things to consider

                    Asbestos/mold will get you passed on unless you’re selling to a flipper

                    You as a buyer are going to want a home that doesn’t have the above so you’re going to want the money that a home without it provides

                    Boomers are so financially illiterate that their retirement plans were that their house would pay for the last 20 years of their lives