• FuckyWucky [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago
    spoiler

    Atlanta just closed the first deal with its new housing production fund; it’s actually a private project, though a local official says they hope to eventually finance publicly owned housing.

    Other places that have considered or taken up the idea — sometimes called social housing, as it’s referred to in Europe — include New York and Massachusetts, as well as Chicago and Chattanooga, Tenn.

    It has to be federally funded for it to work everywhere, local Governments are so financially constrained. But I suppose funding genocide is more important.

    • regul [any]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      It definitely does not have to be federally-funded. Lots of West Coast cities, in the US, are beyond flush, and mixed-income housing is a good investment, especially when you, as a government, have various advantages over private businesses (no property tax, reduced borrowing rate, and streamlined permitting).

      Portland, Oregon’s homeless services budget was $35m last year and none of it went to new public housing.