• Lugh@futurology.todayM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    I sympathize, most of my work falls under the category of ‘creative’ too. But this conversation about AI & robotics needs to quickly move to UBI, or universal access to basic needs like health and housing. The day is coming when AI & robots can do all work, but for pennies on the hour & a free market economy isn’t viable any more. This approach doesn’t acknowledge that; it still assumes a free market economy can work in the future.

    • drspod@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      17 days ago

      The day is coming when AI & robots can do all work

      I really don’t think we are anywhere close to this. I don’t even expect to see it in my lifetime.

      • Lugh@futurology.todayM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        17 days ago

        If AI/robotics follow the typical s-curve of technological adoption, I think the 2030s is most likely. We already seem to be at the beginning of that s-curve in 2024.

        • drspod@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          17 days ago

          If you’re assuming that we have the technology now in its prototypical early-adopter phase then your estimate of 2030 is for adoption of LLMs and generative AI.

          We don’t have even prototypical AGI yet, and it is AGI which is necessary to “do all the work.” The s-curve of technological adoption assumes that the technology exists at the start of the curve. This is what I meant when I said “I really don’t think we are anywhere close to this.”

        • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          17 days ago

          The fields of AI and robotics exists for much longer. The first industrial robot was installed in 1961. The first artificial neural network in 1958. I’d argue the s curve started there. Even humanoid general purpose robots existed in 1986 with Asimo for example. But with such a long lead time, I expect reaching the top of the curve to take multiple decades.

      • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 days ago

        I work in manufacturing environments and the technology is further than i want to admit but luckily businesses NEVER spend the money for the full package. It’s always half DIY at best. It’s always a disaster right around the corner.

    • basmati@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      17 days ago

      Well the world isn’t giving up capitalism until it collapses, so the conversation still makes sense to be stuck around not letting the robots do all the fun stuff while we’re stuck doing pointless busy work to prove we should continue to exist.

      • Lugh@futurology.todayM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        17 days ago

        That is one way of looking at this. An alternative view is to say - “The day is coming when AI & robots can do all work, but for pennies on the hour” - will probably arrive by the 2030s. Every day we waste on pointless conversations that are destined to go nowhere, is a day we waste planning for the future. Worse than that, the chaos and despondency the AI/jobs threat creates, adds to the general conditions that are making the rise of fascism and the far right more prevalent.

        • basmati@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          17 days ago

          You’re assuming the people that own the machines have any interest in keeping us alive to reap the benefits of a mostly automated workforce

          • Lugh@futurology.todayM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            17 days ago

            the people that own the machines have any interest in keeping us alive

            I never take ideas like that seriously. Even in sci-fi, the concept seems wildly fanciful.

            • basmati@lemmus.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              17 days ago

              Have you ever heard the term Superfund site or heard of the company Exxon?

              Companies can, will, and have killed people for far less at the behest of the rich and powerful. If they get a scenario where they think they no longer need us, they’ll make it happen.

      • Lugh@futurology.todayM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 days ago

        apart from posting regularly, sadly I don’t have many ideas. 😞😞

        We’ve had real trouble growing this site from the reddit sub-reddit, and the promotional posts we’ve done, in total, have had tens of thousands of views