TokenBoomer@lemmy.worldM to Progressive Politics@lemmy.world · 1 day agoHegellemmy.worldimagemessage-square19fedilinkarrow-up1145arrow-down110
arrow-up1135arrow-down1imageHegellemmy.worldTokenBoomer@lemmy.worldM to Progressive Politics@lemmy.world · 1 day agomessage-square19fedilink
minus-squareTikiporch@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·1 day agoPhilosophy is not a science.
minus-squareJuicelinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·23 hours agoInvalidating anything that might conflict with your favorite epistemology? Certainly there’s no problem here, as long as you avoid philosophy
minus-squareJuicelinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·23 hours agoThe “rational enlightenment” and its consequences
minus-squareTokenBoomer@lemmy.worldOPMlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·1 day agoAnd yet Philosophy of Science exists.
minus-squareTikiporch@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·24 hours agoThat’s just more philosophy.
minus-squareTikiporch@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·22 hours agoPhilosopher aggrandizes philosophy. Film at 11. Bioethics isn’t a science either.
minus-squareTokenBoomer@lemmy.worldOPMlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·22 hours agoEconomics isn’t a science either, but for some strange reason it persists.
Philosophy is not a science.
Invalidating anything that might conflict with your favorite epistemology? Certainly there’s no problem here, as long as you avoid philosophy
No.
The “rational enlightenment” and its consequences
And yet Philosophy of Science exists.
That’s just more philosophy.
Crazy ain’t it.
Philosopher aggrandizes philosophy. Film at 11.
Bioethics isn’t a science either.
Economics isn’t a science either, but for some strange reason it persists.