The Linux creator is interested in AI, but the hype means he “basically ignores” it.

  • z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    26 days ago

    This. Sorry but I’m a web developer and one of my colleagues obviously uses it without checking if it is correct, then bugs me or others when he doesn’t understand why it doesn’t work as expected. It is frustrating as hell and I’ve explained it to him multiple times:

    • Over prompt the AI if you are going to use it. Long lengthy prompts that are very succinct but give as much context as possible.

    • It is highly preferable to check other sources first like Stack Overflow. Even Medium articles can be better than using AI sometimes.

    • Type out what the AI output rather than just copy and paste. As you type line by line, explain to yourself what is happening.

    • Question everything. Do you think this code will work. Why will it work?

    • Test the code. If it doesn’t work as expected, trouble shoot it.

    • Don’t be afraid to scrap the whole thing and start over. Even open another prompt and try again if you really think the AI can answer the question (there are many cases where your problem is just too specific and the AI can’t).

    He does none of these things. I swear he is the laziest developer I’ve ever met, and I’ve met my fair share.

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        26 days ago

        I have copilot in my IDE and it’s basically worse than the ‘dumb’ autocomplete that just builds off the existing codebase. Copilot knows all the code on GitHub, but doesn’t seem to know anything about the local codebase.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      26 days ago

      Don’t blame all of AI because your coworker is lazy.

      Also its best not to create really long prompts as that can confuse it. Instead, do your job. Its good for smaller things but it can’t replace a human.

    • Rogue@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      I’ve found that just asking “did you make that up again?” after every response improves the quality of code Chat GPT produces. It seems to pick up fairly quickly on methods it just invented.