Tap for spoiler

The bowling ball isn’t falling to the earth faster. The higher perceived acceleration is due to the earth falling toward the bowling ball.

  • red@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    all that is only brain-rot statements with no technical meaning. lemme make this completly clear

    mf= mass of feather mb= mass of ball me= mass of earth ae=accelaration of earth fg=force experienced by both

    now in case of feather

    force on earth is what? yes thats fg =G.mf.me/r^2

    now thats the net force on earth, now what is newtons law? me.ae=G.mf.me/r^2

    we get ae=G.mf/r^2

    similarly in case of ball ae=G.mb/r^2

    and accelaration of earth is clearly more in case of ball, and yes this is accelaration in non inertial frame study newtons laws of motion again if you didnt know, so your second paragraph is utter nonsense

    instead of nonsense brainrot statements like 'Multiplication is associative, you can switch the masses around as you please, nowhere in the formula does it say “the greater mass” or “the smaller mass” you could just as well re-arrange the formula and come up with “earth moves with gm1/M” tell me where in equations you think i am wrong

      • red@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        yet another brain rot reply, man i am done,

        ““earth will move with <something with the same units as G>”. Something that’s definitely something, but not m/s” you idiot i was talking about accelwration, if you need units just put in dementions of all the variables, thats trivial stuff you dont understand nlm at all.

        second para is another non technical nonesense

          • red@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            tell me how Gm/r^2 dosent match acceleration, the fact that i wasted my time on low iq person like you

              • red@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                tell me how gM/m1 is not acceleration, what even is your point omg

                  • red@lemmy.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    literally trivil matter, i didnt even say movement, the point is your statements were still brain rot nonesense and your original comment is wrong and you dont really understand stuff