Conservative pundits are in disbelief and outrage at the highly circulated video, which aimed to show women that their husbands can’t see if they vote for Kamala Harris.

Summary

A video encouraging women to vote independently for Kamala Harris sparked outrage among conservative men, who called it divisive and “amoral.” The video highlights the gender gap that has widened between Harris and Trump, with recent polls showing notable leads by Harris among women and Trump among men.

Critics like Charlie Kirk labeled it “nauseating,” criticizing the wife for lying to “her sweet husband who probably works his tail off to make sure that she can go and have a nice life and provides for the family.”

Supporters argue it reflects real tensions around women’s autonomy, especially in conservative households.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    143·
    10 days ago

    Sooo if you’re a potential husband with a penis, vote for Trump for the following reasons:

    1. Guaranteed husbandry or at least fatherhood. Just go out there and fuck someone, they gotta have the kid no matter what. Your cum is valuable.

    2. Ah yes. You think I forget? You can grab them by the pussy…if you’re famous. So go out there, fuck somebody, be famous and grab them by the pussy!

    3)Earn a second vote. You heard me right. You can’t incriminate each other and therefore her vote is your vote.

    Now go out there and vote! Vote Trump! Fight the enemy within. It’s just not right! Bikini at the pool and allowed to vote? Heck no! Women should be prepared for being attached to a 4x4 in the bedroom permanently for the sole purpose of making love to the man. And sometimes for having babies, but hurry up with that, and don’t feed babies breast milk at the park. And those naked things that happen in California the gay, Oregon and the independent country of Washington State, those gotta go!

      • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
        5·
        10 days ago

        Fuck! I don’t know, I’m just an engineer. Maybe roller skate wheels. It’s a complex design. I’m thinking sex swing hung from a gantry that you can move around the house as you see fit to place the woman where you decide the woman should be at. But you would still need to immobilizer her. They don’t really like being permanently glued to things. You might end up with broken dinner ware. Lobotomy gets you 90% of the way. Maybe republicans can figure it out for us. Like if women were not allowed to sing or hear the voice of other women, that would be a step in the wright direction.