FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to Chronic Illness@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 days agoAhhh more ableist classicslemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square31fedilinkarrow-up1175arrow-down116
arrow-up1159arrow-down1imageAhhh more ableist classicslemmy.blahaj.zoneFundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to Chronic Illness@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 days agomessage-square31fedilink
minus-squareFundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOPMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·edit-26 days agoWhile “predictive processing” is a valid hypothesis, there’s far too little empirical evidence to even start to accept it as fact. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-022-03891-9 Clark’s book is pop science. Some guys scientific theory presented as if it’s fact. It’s championed by some schools of philosophers and cognitive scientists (and wholly refuted by others).
minus-squareEvilschnuff@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-25 days agoI feel like you’re doing Andy Clark a disservice by calling him some guy.
minus-squareShareMySims@sh.itjust.worksMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 days agoThanks for the recommendation, I’ll give it a look.
Removed by mod
While “predictive processing” is a valid hypothesis, there’s far too little empirical evidence to even start to accept it as fact.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-022-03891-9
Clark’s book is pop science. Some guys scientific theory presented as if it’s fact.
It’s championed by some schools of philosophers and cognitive scientists (and wholly refuted by others).
I feel like you’re doing Andy Clark a disservice by calling him some guy.
Thanks for the recommendation, I’ll give it a look.