lemme in@lemm.ee to Privacy@programming.dev · 3 days agoPeriod tracking app refuses to disclose data to American authoritieswww.newsweek.comexternal-linkmessage-square94fedilinkarrow-up1580arrow-down15cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldtechnology@beehaw.orgtechnology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1575arrow-down1external-linkPeriod tracking app refuses to disclose data to American authoritieswww.newsweek.comlemme in@lemm.ee to Privacy@programming.dev · 3 days agomessage-square94fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldtechnology@beehaw.orgtechnology@lemmy.world
minus-squaredisguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down8·3 days agoAll you’ve proven is that neither your claim nor mine is provable. That still doesn’t make you correct. It means neither argument can be proven. At least my argument is logical. You’re convinced Apple would risk blowing up a $3.3T empire for $10M. Get real.
minus-squarePunnyName@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·3 days agoTheir opinion is more valid regarding safety, because it’s skeptical of the behaviors of an international megacorp, which is the smarter approach.
minus-squareunexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down1·edit-23 days agoIn software security, not proven to be secure = not secure https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provable_security
minus-squaredisguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down5·3 days agoProve it. https://security.apple.com/bounty/
All you’ve proven is that neither your claim nor mine is provable.
That still doesn’t make you correct. It means neither argument can be proven.
At least my argument is logical. You’re convinced Apple would risk blowing up a $3.3T empire for $10M.
Get real.
Their opinion is more valid regarding safety, because it’s skeptical of the behaviors of an international megacorp, which is the smarter approach.
In software security, not proven to be secure = not secure
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provable_security
Prove it.
https://security.apple.com/bounty/