• ShakingMyHead@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    13 days ago

    One thing he failed to mention here is that all software fails eventually. So imagine one of those fancy graphics scenes he commissioned being a 100+ car pileup because a software glitch caused a car to make a sudden right-hand turn to a street that doesn’t exist.

      • ShakingMyHead@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 days ago

        He showed an example of that happening today. He seemed to be of the impression that something like that can eventually be ironed out, which it can’t. At least that was my interpretation.

  • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    Hmmm, for something that took so long to make, with such a visibly huge production value, I think the point is rather weak.

    The video spends a lot of time on “but AVs cause accidents too”, without ever opening a single page of statistics, just some horrible articles for shock value. Those few examples are then followed by “drivers kill 40k a year”, which gives me entirely the wrong impression.

    Then it veers off into plausible-sounding, but ultimate unsupported wild speculation, with only a single example about a town going carcentric getting ruined (I’d love a case study on that, it seemed far more interesting than most of the video).

    For a channel that’s normally very good about showing examples and supporting data i can’t help but notice the stark contrast in this video. And that’s not a good look, especially since the case could be made without proclaiming cybernet to be the end of walking.

    • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      You want studies about a potential future? First I don’t think that’s reasonable and second those would be funded and poisoned by the car lobby. Massive industries have been capturing and derailing scientific research since asbestos and radium.

      I totally agree with the author learning from history is our best approach.

    • Architeuthis@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      His overall point appears to be that a city fully optimized for self-driving cars would be a hellscape at ground level, even allowing for fewer accidents, so no real reason to belabor that point, which is mostly made in service to pointing out how dumb it is when your solution to reducing accident rates is “buy a new car” instead of anything systemic. like improving mass transit.

  • Evinceo@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    They’re gonna ruin cities by further limiting the rights of pedestrians to work around their mediocre programming.