threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works to Don't Dead - Open Inside@lemmy.ohaa.xyzEnglish · 16 hours agoWORK NOT HARD SMARTsh.itjust.worksexternal-linkmessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up1117arrow-down11
arrow-up1116arrow-down1external-linkWORK NOT HARD SMARTsh.itjust.worksthreelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works to Don't Dead - Open Inside@lemmy.ohaa.xyzEnglish · 16 hours agomessage-square14fedilink
minus-squareNaich@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up31·16 hours agoIt’s either “work not hard smart” or “work hard not smart”. Either way it doesn’t exactly inspire confidence.
minus-squarePrunebutt@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16arrow-down1·14 hours agoYou’re supposed to read pink, then red, basically like an x… incredibly confusing.
minus-squareVenator@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down3·14 hours agoEven then it doesn’t work:“work smart hard not”
minus-squarePrunebutt@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21arrow-down1·14 hours agoIt does, if you read it like this: 1 3 4 2 I.e.: like no one ever read anything
minus-squareRandomVideos@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·edit-212 hours agoWhat you mean do . I read like that. everything
minus-squareValmond@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·12 hours agoAt least they got the top left correct. Don’t work hard indeed.
It’s either “work not hard smart” or “work hard not smart”. Either way it doesn’t exactly inspire confidence.
You’re supposed to read pink, then red, basically like an x… incredibly confusing.
Even then it doesn’t work:“work smart hard not”
It does, if you read it like this:
I.e.: like no one ever read anything
What you
mean do
.
I read like
that. everything
At least they got the top left correct.
Don’t work hard indeed.