• Lauchs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    What new settlements happened thete in the last year? You are conflating an increase in tensions and conflict with expansion.

      • Lauchs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        From the article:

        In the past year, about 4,555 Palestinians have been displaced in the West Bank after Israeli forces demolished their homes.

        Now, I’m no mathematician but surely you understand that’s orders of magnitude fewer than have been displaced in Gaza, right? Please?

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yes, because violence in the West Bank has always been lower-level than the violence in Gaza. I’m not sure what point you’re trying to make is.

          • Lauchs@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Always does not mean “since I started paying attention” but regardless…

            Anyway, you’re so close! Let’s tey the socratic method, given that the West Bank has been an Israeli target for years, why do you think the violence has been at such a lower level than Gaza since the rapes and murders of Oct 7th?

            And why did that coincidentally change days after the election, with Smoterich now directing “the start of professional work to prepare the necessary infrastructure to apply Israeli sovereignty over Judea and Samaria.”

            If you’re ruling out Biden etc, was it just a wild miracle of timing?

            • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Always does not mean “since I started paying attention” but regardless…

              Huh? Are we even talking about the same conflict? This has been the case since 2005 when Israel disengaged from Gaza.

              why do you think the violence has been at such a lower level than Gaza since the rapes and murders of Oct 7th?

              Uh… Because there’s no resistance worth mentioning in the West Bank? They don’t need to do much for their colonial project in the West Bank, but if settlers tried entering Gaza they’d just be shot.

              And why did that coincidentally change days after the election, with Smoterich now directing “the start of professional work to prepare the necessary infrastructure to apply Israeli sovereignty over Judea and Samaria.”

              It didn’t change, but that aside he might’ve felt emboldened to say it out loud, but we still don’t know if the rest of the Israeli government will allow that. In case they do anytime soon, the only conclusion would be that there were plans for such an action from before the election.

              • Lauchs@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                Look, if you understand the simmering West Bank conflict and slow annexation then it’s even sillier to try and argue that trump and Harris mean the same thing for Palestinians, which was the entire point of the original comment.

                Under trump, it looks like that project might finally get finished, whereas a Harris Biden administration was at the very least basically keeping the status quo intact.

                Ideally, as tik tok has taught many progressives that Palestine exists and is worthy of care, you could see progressives voting (okay, but a man can dream) in the Democratic 2026 primaries and moving towards a 2 state solution. That is in now way realistic under a trump administration and once the annexation is finished, there isn’t a going back.

                but that aside he might’ve felt emboldened to say it out loud,

                Yeah, almost like it was something he wasn’t able to say or pursue during a Biden administration. Of course there were plans but being able to act on them required trump to win.

                • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  whereas a Harris Biden administration was at the very least basically keeping the status quo intact.

                  Which is… not exactly something to be proud of since the only difference between what they’re trying to do and the status quo is what things are names. It’s not exactly a good thing, but also not the gotcha you think it is.

                  • Lauchs@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    That’s an impressively self centered privileged possible view.

                    “Sure, a lot of you are going to die but I think it would have happened either way so there’s no difference between Harris and trump.”

                    Especially when you factor in the Left’s newfound support for Palestine and that there would presumably be support to push for changing the status quo, this somehow manages to be an even dumber take.

                    the only difference between what they’re trying to do and the status quo is what things are names.

                    That’s just nonsense. One is likely the end of the road for Palestineans in the West Bank, the other at least has chances for an alternative.

                    It’s as dumb as arguing that climate change would be the same under either President because you don’t think things will change.

      • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        You are arguing with absolute liars. It’s like people only thinking this mess accelerated under Biden (who is the most paid politician by AIPAC) is just a coincidence. As if Israel hasn’t been expanding into some of the most important Palestinian cities while the world focuses on Gaza.

        It’s the same people who say what can Biden possibly do while funding their military operations. Trump sees the praise Biden is getting from Congress and actually thinks Biden must have been doing something right. Yet, somehow there was a good choice for people who want to see Palestine prosper (Those who pretend that Harris would do better because she doesn’t shout her plans out like some cliché comic book villain).

        But let’s call Trump a huge liar and let’s take his word at face value when it’s convenient for us. I’m sure the Democrats who never learn a thing will be excited to lose the next election as well. Obviously, Trump won’t be a good president but Democrats lost because they were seen as slightly less evil but with no charisma.

        It’s not us, everyone else is just stupid. - Democrats