He’s not ranked poorly, he’s just in the “unproven” group.
That’s a correct ranking for a player that only has 8 games under his belt. You’ve gotta see it for a longer period of time before you can slot him accurately.
NFL history is full of guys that could do it for one magic season. Purdy has to prove that he’s not one of them first.
Yeah, the original Athletic article was very clear on what it meant. All the sites that jumped on the article to use as fodder for their own reaction articles were, as you put it, more clickbaity.
He’s not ranked poorly, he’s just in the “unproven” group.
That’s a correct ranking for a player that only has 8 games under his belt. You’ve gotta see it for a longer period of time before you can slot him accurately.
NFL history is full of guys that could do it for one magic season. Purdy has to prove that he’s not one of them first.
Yep you’re right. I think the headlines I’m seeing are mostly clickbait…but isn’t everything nowadays
Yeah, the original Athletic article was very clear on what it meant. All the sites that jumped on the article to use as fodder for their own reaction articles were, as you put it, more clickbaity.