Please don’t auto downvote before reading.

A little bit ago some asked a question about why the hate of the blockchain, and that got me thinking if there even was a legitimate use case where the blockchain would be beneficial, but I couldn’t think of one outside maybe some sort of decentralized bank, but before I knew I was thinking it would instantly turn into some crypto scheme and strapped it, because crypto currencies are a scam on every level – and no they aren’t private or secret as some think either.

So I wanted to ask the community. Instead of using the blockchain for crypto, is there a better use where the blockchain could benefit society?

    • lennybird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Ironically, you’re accepting fascism is here by preventing us from advancing with a more secure election system that would permit a more responsible, accessible digital voting, are you not?

      You’re holding us back for fear of what could be.

      Even in the wake of what already is a practical reality as I showed.

      • B1naryB0t@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        29 days ago

        Thats a lot of mental gymnastics to justify a massive overhaul of a system which would open up a whole slate of security issues. I get it, I used to believe strongly in blockchain but so far it seems to be a solution looking desperately for a problem to solve. You cannot “tech” your way out of societal issue.

        • lennybird@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          29 days ago

          The more voter accessibility, the better vote turnout. It’s no different than going the opposite way with voter suppression strategy or Jim crow laws. Most states already utilize digital transfer of voting data to state secretary central branches to my knowledge.

          Not only this but it (a) actually helps prevent voter fraud while (b) improving turnout by way of digital accessibility.

          If we shot down every idea from the peanut gallery because it wasn’t simple on its surface we wouldn’t have a lot of things.

          But what did I notice is that you’ve now twice dodged the fact that the thing you’re most scared about implementing this is already a reality.

          So can you explicitly tell me what unavoidable downside it would bring that doesn’t already exist in reality?