• Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    27 days ago

    I think you’re reading too deep into this. They’re skilled workers who specialize in some very difficult jobs and had the good sense to unionize to prevent getting fucked too hard by owners and the management class. That said, I don’t think most of them realize they’re contradicting themselves at the gubernatorial level by electing people who “talk like them” or “tell it like it is” versus someone who at least did the political calculus of siding with them to a small degree on strikes.

    • Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      27 days ago

      Either you’re not answering the question, or I am entirely misunderstanding this entire thread. You said:

      I hate to say this but they’re tradesmen and not necessarily critical thinkers.

      To me, this comes off as extremely condescending — it reads like you are saying that people who are tradesmen are incapable of complex thought (ie critical thinking). I’m simply asking for you to explicitly clarify that statement. If my reading is incorrect, then how would you word it to make it more clear? How you reword it might clarify your intent and explain your following replies.


      They’re skilled workers who specialize in some very difficult jobs and had the good sense to unionize to prevent getting fucked too hard by owners and the management class.

      Is this statement clarifying the people that you think “aren’t critical thinkers”?