• TheFogan@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Pretty true, obviously most racist biggots don’t see themselves as racist biggots. They don’t see us as “open minded” they see us as close minded to their views.

    • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      73
      ·
      2 days ago

      Depends on the person. I’ve been told to my face without a hint of irony that “you’re so open minded all your brains fell out”.

      • bizarroland@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I spent most of my childhood being repeatedly informed by my incredibly Republican family that I lack common sense.

        Yet, I have the common sense to know that if you let people do whatever the fuck they want to do with their own bodies and lives then they’ll stay the fuck out of your body and your life.

        Perhaps that is an uncommon sense. However, it should be a common sense but the people who claim to have common sense fail to understand that consistently.

        Maybe common sense is not all it’s cracked up to be.

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Common sense is a thought terminator. It’s just “everyone who’s smart agrees with this”. It’s common sense you shouldn’t inject any aspect of a disease causing pathogen into people. It’s common sense that you can’t burn so much stuff you make the whole sky smoky or permanently warm the planet. It’s common sense that you don’t share an ancestor with an oak tree. Now none of that is true. You should get vaccines, uncontrolled combustion creates smog and contributes to global warming, and all eukaryotic organisms share a common ancestor. But if you phrase things right and say it’s obvious people will agree with your false statements and think people are over educated idiots for being right.

        • r3g3n3x@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          The bigger obstacle the left and right have to finding common ground is the hypocrisy of body autonomy. Vaccines, women’s rights, trans rights, drugs, health choices and more derived of things like this all boil down to an individual decision to do what they want with their own body and no one has any consistent logic. This is just one source of disagreement.

          We’re way past the point of needing ranked choice voting to allow people to truly support the ideas the most identify with without being lumped in with other groups simply to avoid loss of voting power in a first past the post environment.

          • chuymatt@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            No. It is consistent. Bodily autonomy for everyone. You don’t get to go into the populations as a plague rat and kill others with your idiocy, though. That impinges on their freedoms.

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Being convinced to give a shit about other people just shows that you’re gullible, to them.

    • bizarroland@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      2 days ago

      And, their views typically do not include the things that most of the people I know hate the most about the platform that they ascribe to.

      They just think being Republican will make them wealthier or fix problems in the country or make the world a better place.

      The single issue voters have an opinion on a single issue and everything else doesn’t matter compared to that one thing.

      They don’t care about all of the bad as long as the single bit of good can be accomplished, and they don’t care if you think that single bit of good is a bad thing.

      They don’t care to talk to or be dissuaded by their family members who are not approaching them with a spirit of love and care for them.

      Beside that, it’s not mentally or emotionally healthy to live spring-loaded with ontological traps that can be fired off with a single phrase to bring down judgment and the fires of hell on the people you meet.

      They’re not going to want to hear you if that’s what you’re bringing to the table.

      • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        2 days ago

        Of course, after Trump in the white house, it’s kinda irrelevant.

        Historians have a word for Germans who joined the Nazi party, not because they hated Jews, but out of a hope for restored patriotism, or a sense of economic anxiety, or a hope to preserve their religious values, or dislike of their opponents, or raw political opportunism, or convenience, or ignorance, or greed.
        That word is “Nazi.” Nobody cares about their motives anymore.
        They joined what they joined. They lent their support and their moral approval. And, in so doing, they bound themselves to everything that came after. Who cares any more what particular knot they used in the binding?

        • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          2 days ago

          Sure, let’s just casually label half the fucking country as Nazis. That definitely worked last time.

          Prime fucking example of exactly what their first comment was talking about.

          • voracitude@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            “We” aren’t labeling “them” anything. They literally sided with Neo-Nazis. People carrying swastika flags in support of Trump, and you think “not Nazis” were ok with that? Sorry friend, but no. If someone is okay to march with Nazis, they’re a fucking Nazi.

            • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              21 hours ago

              I must have missed something if every single Trump voter was out there marching with the ones carrying the nazi flag. Maybe I should get my eyes checked, as I sure didn’t see tens of millions of people in those photos.


              Stop misusing literally.


              I understand what you’re getting at, but I vehemently disagree that guilt by association can be reasonably applied to the entirety of a group this fucking large. Has the same feel to me as being distrustful of every person with dark skin because of skewed crime statistics.

              • voracitude@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                13 hours ago

                I’m not misusing the word. They saw Nazi flags flying and at best they thought

                Well, I might not agree with what they’re saying, but they have a right to say it

                Except that what a Nazi flag says is incompatible with what this country should be, with what these people who think themselves “patriots” profess to believe. You don’t think guilty by association is fair? Explain to me why not, please. In what way is “Yep, being on the same side as Nazis is fine” not just being a fucking Nazi? I will be positively floored if you can come up with a single reasonable scenario to convince me there’s any difference.

                And don’t think this is in bad faith, either. If you can convince me you might just give me a fighting chance to forgive my family who went off the deep end. It is actually quite important to me, I’ve just given up there’s any hope of getting through to them after so long. Especially now he won.

          • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            It’s not a nice way to say it, but it is important to distinguish conservatism from the current situation where you have conservatives supporting nazis, planning concentration camps, and planning to pull a Hong Kong-style silencing of the opposition.

            It is important to tell conservatives that the guy they voted for has gone off the deep end. For diplomatic reasons, I would probably avoid emotional words and say something along the lines of “we’re concerned that Trump plans to illegally block the democratic party from elections and trans people and immigrants may have to flee the country in the face of workplace discrimination or outright persecution and violence. His politicization of the military could lead to another coup attempt.”

            But that’s just part of how you defuse fascism, those are the words you use with both Putin supporters and Trump supporters.

            There is no place on earth and no time in history where “guh, inflation” is a reasonable excuse to vote for a nazi.