Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful youā€™ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cutā€™nā€™paste it into its own post ā€” thereā€™s no quota for posting and the bar really isnā€™t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many ā€œesotericā€ right wing freaks, but thereā€™s no appropriate sneer-space for them. Iā€™m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged ā€œculture criticsā€ who write about everything but understand nothing. Iā€™m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. Theyā€™re inescapable at this point, yet I donā€™t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldnā€™t be surgeons because they didnā€™t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I canā€™t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Semi-obligatory thanks to @dgerard for starting this.)

  • o7___o7@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    Ā·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I read the headline yesterday and thought, ā€œThis is 100% fundraising bullshit.ā€

    This strikes me as being exact same class of thing OpenAI does when they pronounce that their product will murder us all.

    What do we call this? Marketerrorism?

      • o7___o7@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        Ā·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        CRITIHYPE, thank you! I couldnā€™t find the word!

        If I had to guess a motive, it would be to bring mirror biology out of the obscurity of pure research (who funds that anymore?) and to instead plant it firmly into the popular zeitgeist as a ā€œscary thingā€ that needs to be defended against. This can lead to it becoming a trendy topic, and therefore fundable by grant-awarding agencies.