• NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    95
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    You know what would make the auction process more transparent? Don’t make it a blind auction.

    On a different note, is there a Gofundme up for The Onion to make sure they win the next auction yet?

    • Rykzon@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 day ago

      Too late now that this got media awareness, if you believe a GoFundMe is going to raise more than some right-wing media outlet I have a bridge to sell

      • NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 day ago

        Well that might be true, but the silver lining is that the larger the price tag, the more the Sandy Hook victims actually get. It’s almost like duping the crooked billionaires to pay their taxes.

      • villainy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 day ago

        I don’t understand why this matters. The families knowingly accepted the lower bid so The Onion could try and do some good with the brand. It seems like, at the point where it’s being auctioned off with all proceeds going to the families, InfoWars should effectively be theirs to do with as they please.

      • tburkhol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        Read further. There are two judgements against Jones: one for ~$50M and one for ~$1B. In a normal bankruptcy resolution, the 8 families of the $1B judgement will get 95% of the proceeds, while the 2 families of $50M get 5%. “Sandy Hook families forgoing $750,000” means that those 8 families are effectively giving $750k of their millions to the 2 families, resulting in a more even distribution of compensation across the whole group.

      • NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        Well my assumption is that the next auction will be won by the highest bidder, so your point isn’t really contradictory.

        • half_fiction@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          The judge did not actually order a new auction, just left the next steps up to the trustee who oversaw the first auction. The article specifically points this out so I’m not sure if this means there wr other ways it could play out besides redoing the auction.