Posadas [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net to the_dunk_tank@hexbear.netEnglish · 1 年前China seeks food security, but at what cost?hexbear.netimagemessage-square398fedilinkarrow-up1302arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up1302arrow-down1imageChina seeks food security, but at what cost?hexbear.netPosadas [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net to the_dunk_tank@hexbear.netEnglish · 1 年前message-square398fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareedge [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up79·1 年前Lenin dismissed the Economist as “a journal which speaks for British millionaires”.
minus-squarejackmarxist [any]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up49·1 年前Well he must be feeling stupid now since the economist exclusively speaks for Billionaires
minus-squareCatradora_Stalinism [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·1 年前Lenin is done for
minus-squareProfessorAdonisCnut [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up41·1 年前It’s amazing that the only part of that which has shifted at all is the wealth level implied by ‘millionaire’
Lenin dismissed the Economist as “a journal which speaks for British millionaires”.
Well he must be feeling stupid now since the economist exclusively speaks for Billionaires
Lenin is done for
deleted by creator
It’s amazing that the only part of that which has shifted at all is the wealth level implied by ‘millionaire’
deleted by creator