You’re using a different source than I used. Look at the US hunger rate under the same definition as the China hunger rate. Different sources have looser ways of defining hunger.
The source on that “shady website” is the world bank and it’s fucking linked right on the website.
The united states government has a looser way of defining hunger in their own country than the world bank?
Yes. A rich country might internally define hunger as anyone dealing with food insecurity, an international organization looking largely at 2nd and 3rd world countries would have stricter definitions.
What is this, if not support for a more laissez faire approach?
What is (33 million divided by 330 million) multiplied by 100?
You’re using a different source than I used. Look at the US hunger rate under the same definition as the China hunger rate. Different sources have looser ways of defining hunger.
The united states government has a looser way of defining hunger in their own country than a shady investment website that doesnt even have https? Didn’t they teach you how to choose reliable sources of information in highschool?
The source on that “shady website” is the world bank and it’s fucking linked right on the website.
Yes. A rich country might internally define hunger as anyone dealing with food insecurity, an international organization looking largely at 2nd and 3rd world countries would have stricter definitions.