• jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I can’t speak for frostpunk 2, but frostpunk 1 was like a roguelike city simulator that teased some lore while beating your face in with disaster after disaster. It was novel for a bit, but i had zero interest in repeating that experience with frost punk 2.

    I think narrative driven story rich games are great, but I don’t think frostpunk fits into that category. Frost punk was a rogue-like with a theme.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3kwK3m261Mw Even when the stupendium song came out for frostpunk 2, i watched it with interest, but didn’t really want to play the game again.

    One of the big problems with NARRATIVE games, where there is only one narrative - is replayability. BG3 is a master-class in branching narrative and evolving worlds, more akin to a D&D session with a really, really, really, well prepared GM - so people play it over and over… and their friends seem them playing it, and it encourages them to try it.

    I don’t think i’ve ever seen any of my friends playing frostpunk

    Even if you want to play a single player narrative game, there is no urgency to buy it, it is 100% perfect for patient gamers to wishlist and wait for a deep discount, there is no social urgency to play with friends like hell divers 2.

    Steamdb:

    It’s unusual for the sequel to have less players

    • RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      That is with an assumption that both games are equally well received. I was actually pretty hyped for frost punk 2 after finishing the first game but was disappointed when the review came in. It was overall considered as a downgrade or not as good as the first game and the ratings show that as well. Same situation with the forest but I think sons of forest will also improve with time but as a patient gamer, I can wait and get a better discount anyway.