• ArbiterXero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yes and those kernel modules that get loaded in to control hardware interfaces are often referred to as drivers.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Those can’t really be updated independently of the kernel so they are effectively baked it.

        Also the modules are dependent on how it is compiled you can include them in the kernel binary or you can have them separate.

        • ArbiterXero@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 day ago

          ……… what are you talking about?

          The new modules can absolutely be updated independently of the kernel.

          The modules need to be built against your version of the kernel, but MANY versions of the modules work (and are compiled against) different kernel versions.

          Just look at nvidia, a nearly duplicate version of this exact problem. They have MANY versions you can install at any given time for their cards.

          • lengau
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            But also, fundamentally… Those modules are the device drivers, regardless of whether they’re separable from the kernel. That’s part of why they’re organised under the drivers directory in the kernel source tree.

      • lengau
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Most kernel level drivers are modules (though they don’t have to be compiled that way), but many modules are things other than drivers.