• AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I had an interview with a “mass email” provider. By the time I left it was clear to both of us that no way in hell.

    Is it bad that I consider this much worse than a defense company? Lockheed has some cool tech and help protect my country, at the huge cost of killing so many. Cambridge Analytica indiscriminately attacks people’s privacy, all people, and for profit with no hint at a good purpose

    • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I’m sure I still don’t appreciate that historically speaking the world has been quite a dangerous place.

      I’m not a fan of dead kids or rich men sending the young to die for them, but I cannot deny my lifestyle significantly benefits from the fact top military spenders align with my ideology. (e.g. I’m better off with a powerful USA than North Korea)

      Would be interesting if a new generation of principled Americans were responsible for a change where defense contractors knew to attract modern talent they had to provide assurances against outputs being used for evil. I’m naïve enough to think that might be possible.

      • Jtee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Hot take but a world without the USA would probably have a lot more war in it.

        • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          The EU wouldn’t be able to get away with the low defense spending. Even with the war in Ukraine, they seemed to realize they’re spending too little. Granted, the US does overspend.