• inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Also, many of these are setup with the guidance of a parent.

    👀 ok it’s one thing for kids to be clever and circumvent age restrictions on websites, it’s another thing for their parents to help them. That’s just bad parenting. Reminds me of a friend of mine who’s mom would buy him alcohol starting around 15 - guess what, at 25 he’s a raging fucking alcoholic who threw his life away. And he was a natural talent and athlete who could of potentially gone pro in his sport.

    • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m guessing you don’t have children.

      Underaged drinking is nothing like having an account that lets them use the full set of features.

      Laws around social media do not allow parental discretion. Do you think allowing a 13 to watch R movies is bad parenting or should that be left up to the parent to decide?

      Would you blame movies for teen pregnancy?

      Do you blame video games for violence?

      The unfortunate reality is your alcoholic friend was likely to become one either the way.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’ve read that starting drinking early is a solid indicator of future addiction. OTOH I thinks it’s largely genetic.

        • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Correct. Largely genetic to the point there are specific genes that are link to it.

          The early drinking part is likely because they are being raised by alcoholics so access to easy and possibly encouraged.

          Claiming early drinking alone is responsible for alcoholism is about as meaningful as blaming early marijuana use to drug addiction.

          The path to the destination may leads through certain steps but does not require those steps. There is a reason many children of addicts choose absolute abstention.

      • inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I’m guessing you don’t have children.

        No, and no intention. Irrelevant.

        Underaged drinking is nothing like having an account that lets them use the full set of features.

        Both are addictive substances that interfere with brain development. One you have to drink to affect brain chemistry, the other you have to use. Social media networks are designed to be addictive.

        The internet of today is going to be looked at one day the same way cigarettes are today.

        Do you think allowing a 13 to watch R movies is bad parenting or should that be left up to the parent to decide?

        Not an addictive substance.

        Would you blame movies for teen pregnancy?

        Not an addictive substance.

        Do you blame video games for violence?

        I blame violent society.

        The unfortunate reality is your alcoholic friend was likely to become one either the way.

        Irrelevant. Anybody’s brain chemistry can be fucked with. Just look at kids going through withdrawal symptoms when they don’t have their tech toys.

        • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          You don’t have children and have no plans so let me let you in on a little parenting secret:

          Never tell other people how to parent their children.

          I’m not gong to bother touching the idea you’ve got in your head that social media is an addictive substance but tv and movies are not not the idea that tech withdrawal is anything like drug withdrawal.

          • m_f@discuss.onlineM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            17 hours ago

            This comment would be better without the “I’m not gong to bother touching the idea you’ve got in your head” bit. It comes across as passive aggressive, and could be replaced with “It doesn’t make sense to me” or similar without loss of meaning.

            We’re trying to foster chill conversation in this community, because there’s plenty of other places online and on Lemmy for charged discussion.

            • m_f@discuss.onlineM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              17 hours ago

              This comment would’ve been a lot better without the insult. It had a good response, but starting any reply with “Fuck off”, even if you felt insulted first, leads to yelling matches, which isn’t what we’re going for here