Sega has officially announced that it is not planning to release any more mini consoles, marking a shift in their approach towards modern gaming instead of nostalgia-driven hardware. In an interview with The Guardian, CEO Shuji Utsumi clarified, ‘We are not a retro company. We appreciate our legacy… but want to deliver something new.’

Sega has previously released several successful mini consoles celebrating its iconic franchises such as the Genesis/Mega Drive Mini, Astro City Mini, and Game Gear Micro series. However, no further mini consoles focusing on the Saturn or Dreamcast platforms are in development.

  • Utsumi’s Statement: “I’m not going for the Mini direction. I want to embrace modern gamers.”
  • Sega now concentrates on reviving classic IPs with a modern twist, such as new entries in Crazy Taxi, Jet Set Radio, and Virtua Fighter series.

How do you feel about Sega’s decision?

  • tiramichu@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    “Not a retro company,” but yet the stated “something new” is all about reviving classic IPs.

    Maybe try building some new IPs, if you really want to be new.

  • ramblingsteve@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    so sega realised that rather than sell a retro console once, they can sell a reboot filled with DLC and monthly subscriptions forever. nice.

    • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      Nah, they realized that emulating the Saturn and Dreamcast are more demanding than the SoCs they wanted to use for their mini consoles can handle.

      • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I mean, I just bought a $60 portable that has a screen as well, and it can emulate Dreamcast no problem. I assume bulk hardware costs are maybe half that price. For a $120+ priced retro console, I suspect hardware pricing is not the issue.

        • [R3D4CT3D]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          how do you like that portable? mind sharing the model?

          • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Sure, it’s the RG35XXSP (link). I mainly bought it for GBA emulation (since it’s a GBA SP lookalike with good reviews). It’s played every PSX and DC game I’ve thrown at it as well. The game pad works great and the screen is nice, and the default software doesn’t have any real annoyances, not much to complain about.

            The downside is it doesn’t have analog sticks, so if that were my primary goal I’d probably look for another system. But plenty powerful.

            • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              I got an R36S, which is shaped more like a DMG GameBoy and has dual analog sticks. It can play Dreamcast, but only at native resolution and sometimes it needs to be tweaked further. Saturn is actually a tad slow, dipping into 40fps usually. It can also do some less intensive PSP games. For a $60 handheld, this is fine. But considering SEGA is SEGA, I suspect that they want a much bigger profit margin than whoever is selling the R36S is making. Which is why I mentioned the SoCs in my comment.

      • TBi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yep. They’ll probably change their tune again when more powerful SoC’s come out.

  • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Really, why not both? I’d love to see non-micro-transaction modern Sega, if that’s the plan, but the demographics are there to support retro too.

    Maybe they don’t want retro to overshadow their new products, but if their new products can’t demand more attention than their retro products, it sounds like a quality problem with their new products.

  • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s correct. Atari is making modern games too, I’m excited for Fatal Run 2089. The art form is still quite new, and there’s a lot of room for new ideas