Suppose you have a fediverse admin, perhaps one of the several who are oppressive, and they are roaming around somewhere like Twitter or Reddit. One day they spot someone on there they don’t like, maybe someone they know from the fediverse or maybe not, and they give the person a hard time. Are we allowed to talk about those activities, especially considering the barrier is already crossed the other way?

    • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.eeEnglish
      21·
      5 hours ago

      You say that like he’s me or that either of us have been doing as you say just because it’s easy to attribute things to others without proof. None of that is true, heck your sources claim I’ve been banned from this place out of spite, which is verifiably false.

        • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.eeEnglish
          21·
          5 hours ago

          You don’t know how a place works if you are only going to undermine the difference between a community ban and a total ban out of spite. You also misunderstand me if I’ve said anything you claim I am. You and your co-targeters have been told many times you don’t speak for what others mean when they say or do something, especially when the main defense to someone actually thinking critically about everything is to go after them too.

            • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.eeEnglish
              12·
              4 hours ago

              Because you can’t speak for another’s intentions. And this (along with me being banned from there; that’s only one half of their domain) is reiterated as many times as it has been for the very reason that it has to be. It’s not anyone acting like a “broken record” when it’s in response to something just as repetitive. This was also my point when talking about Elon Musk who you refer to as a Nazi, as well as the things after that you accuse me of, with the slur against trans people having been apologized for two years ago (with the person I said it to being on good terms with me still) because I didn’t know the name of a fictional race from One Piece could ever be a slur.

                • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.eeEnglish
                  12·
                  4 hours ago

                  Here is a challenge for you. Point to where I said anything about a shooter. You are quite literally making stuff up, using a relic of a past conversation that doesn’t 100% accurately relay what was going on. If I apologize for something I did towards someone and the person forgives me, that’s their choice, not yours. One piece of “evidence” provided years ago does not show one’s whole true self in the present.