• CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    5 days ago

    His stated purpose of being there and taking his gun was to protect property (by taking lives if necessary) from people who were damaging property in order to protect lives (the BLM protests).

    • RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      5 days ago

      Huh. I don’t really consider Kyle Rittenhouse a valid source of my moral philosophy, so I’ve never heard his manifesto before.

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 days ago

        Considering the lack of consequences for his actions, and that he’s been paraded around since by the party that won the election, it shows the moral philosophy of the country and its legal system.

        • RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          5 days ago

          At best it only shows the moral philosophy of the plurality of people who bothered to vote, and your defeatism is tantamount to enabling their attitude.

          One guy had an idea of the relationship between property and (black) lives and got into a fight which ended in a death and was acquitted for murder.

          Do you think that because Casey Anthony was acquitted, America thinks killing kids is no biggie? What if a few people signal boosted her to rabble rouse their base?

          It’s a handful of morons who are now disproportionately at the helm. They don’t speak for you or me.

          • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            5 days ago

            Do you think that because Casey Anthony was acquitted, America thinks killing kids is no biggie?

            Gestures broadly

              • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                5 days ago

                Yes, that’s exactly what I said. You are definitely communicating in good faith and continuing to respond to you would be a good use of my time.

                • RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  Oh no, someone gave up on arguing with you in good faith when you’ve been glib this entire time!

                  Everyone else but you has to play by the rules, eh?

                  • grue@lemmy.worldM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    7
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    5 days ago

                    Using obvious sarcasm as a rhetorical technique is not in bad faith.

                    Aggressively playing dumb to manufacture an excuse to attack the person doing so as if his argument were sincere, even though you yourself admit you knew he’d “been glib this entire time,” however, is in bad faith.

                    This is your warning.